VIEWS OF THE PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS STUDYING AT PEDAGOGICAL FORMATION TRAINING CERTIFICATION PROGRAM ON APPLICATION LEVEL OF TURKISH SPELLING RULES AND PUNCTUATION MARKS
Author :
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to specify the views of prospective teachers studying at Pedagogical Formation Training Certification Program on applying spelling rules and punctuation Marks. Interview technique was used within the scope of qualitative research method. Research is conducted by 20 students who are training at certification program related to pedagogical formation training at a university in the Eastern Black Sea region of Turkey. As data collection tool semi structured interview forms are used in order to get the views of the prospective teachers on the level of applying spelling rules and punctuation Marks in the scope of pedagogical formation training. The data procured by interviews is firstly taped by receiving participants approval, then tape recordings are textualized in the context of content analysis and at last they are destroyed after receiving confirmation of the participant about their whole and complete situation according to the ethical principles. The data obtained by interviews are commented by descriptive analysis method in the scope of scientific research methods by making content analysis. In the end of the research it is determined that the prospective teachers felt incompetent about spelling rules and punctuation Marks as they have deficiencies in this matter. According to them this is stemmed from the deficiencies being in the grammar teaching as well as the lack of strategy, method and technique, deficiencies caused by applications, stereotyped perspectives in the language training and the insensitiveness of the teachers and students in this matter, lack of national awareness, lack of interest in Turkish, Language and Expression, Turkish Language I-II for Universities, and therefore reading-and-writing applications should be practices in due course, different methods and techniques should be used in language training, problems related to teacher trains have to be removed, Turkish teaching in general and spelling rules and punctuation Marks in particular must play a significant role in education. It is also observed that understanding levels and language skills of the students effect their development. In this respect, suggestions related to the problems have been made at the end of the research.
Keywords
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to specify the views of prospective teachers studying at Pedagogical Formation Training Certification Program on applying spelling rules and punctuation Marks. Interview technique was used within the scope of qualitative research method. Research is conducted by 20 students who are training at certification program related to pedagogical formation training at a university in the Eastern Black Sea region of Turkey. As data collection tool semi structured interview forms are used in order to get the views of the prospective teachers on the level of applying spelling rules and punctuation Marks in the scope of pedagogical formation training. The data procured by interviews is firstly taped by receiving participants approval, then tape recordings are textualized in the context of content analysis and at last they are destroyed after receiving confirmation of the participant about their whole and complete situation according to the ethical principles. The data obtained by interviews are commented by descriptive analysis method in the scope of scientific research methods by making content analysis. In the end of the research it is determined that the prospective teachers felt incompetent about spelling rules and punctuation Marks as they have deficiencies in this matter. According to them this is stemmed from the deficiencies being in the grammar teaching as well as the lack of strategy, method and technique, deficiencies caused by applications, stereotyped perspectives in the language training and the insensitiveness of the teachers and students in this matter, lack of national awareness, lack of interest in Turkish, Language and Expression, Turkish Language I-II for Universities, and therefore reading-and-writing applications should be practices in due course, different methods and techniques should be used in language training, problems related to teacher trains have to be removed, Turkish teaching in general and spelling rules and punctuation Marks in particular must play a significant role in education. It is also observed that understanding levels and language skills of the students effect their development. In this respect, suggestions related to the problems have been made at the end of the research.
Keywords
- Aksan, D. (1979). Her yönüyle dil ana çizgileriyle dilbilim I. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
- Aktaş, Ş., Gündüz, O. (2011). Yazılı ve sözlü anlatım (15. bs.). Ankara: Akçağ Yayınları.
- Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S. & Yıldırım, E. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Sakarya: Sakarya Kitabevi.
- Arıcı, A. F. (2008). Writing errors of university students. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi XXI (2), 209-220
- Arık, A. (1992). Psikolojide bilimsel yöntem. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Basımevi ve Film Merkezi.
- Aşılıoğlu, B. (1993). Ortaokullarda Türkçe öğretimi (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
- Atasoy, F. O. (2009). Türkçede noktalama (sorunlar-çözümler-teklifler) (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
- Atasoy, F. O. (2010). The history of punctuation marks. International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic Volume 5(2). Doi:10.7827/TurkishStudies.1345
- Bağcı, H. (2011). Elementary 8th grade student’s level of ability to apply spelling rules and punctuation marks. Turkish Studies - International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 6(1), 693-706. Doi:10.7827/TurkishStudies.1973
- Bayram, Y., & Erdemir, A. (2006). Amasya’daki ilköğretim ikinci kademe öğrencilerinin‘imlâ kurallarını kullanma düzeyleri’ üzerine bir değerlendirme. Millî Eğitim Dergisi. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları, (171), 140-155.
- Bilgin, M. (2006). Anlamdan anlatıma Türkçemiz. Ankara: Anı Yayınları.
- Bozdoğan, A. E., Aydın, D., & Yıldırım, K. (2007). Attitudes of teacher candidates towards teaching profession. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD), 8(2), 83-97.
- Bryson, F. K. (2003). An examination of two methods of delivering writing instruction to fourth grade students. Unpublished master thesis, Texas Woman’s University, Texas. (UMI No: 1417565)
- Bulut, M. (2013). Spelling guideline studies carried out from the republic period to the present and a bibliography study on Turkish spelling guidelines. International Journal of Social Science Dergisi. 6(6), 277-304. Doi number: http://dx.doi.org/10.9761/JASSS1508.
- Cemiloğlu, M. (2004). Üniversitelerde Okutulan Türk dili dersi ile ilgili tespitler değerlendirmeler ve öneriler. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi XVII (2), 173182.
- Creswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. California: Sage Publications.
- Demirel, Ö. (2004). Türkçe ve sınıf öğretmenleri için Türkçe öğretimi (6. bs.). Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
- Dursun, F., Yenen, E. T., & Bulut, A. (2018). Opinions of the candidate and mentor teachers about the candidate teacher training process. International Journal of Educational Sciences. MM-IJES, 2(2): 1-17
- Eker, S. (2002). Çağdaş Türk dili. Ankara: Grafiker Yayınları.
- Güneş, F. (2014).Türkçe öğretimi yaklaşımlar ve modeller. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
- Güney, K., & Semerci, Ç. (2009). The effect of micro-reflective teaching method in accordance with the reflective thinking activities of student teachers. Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi Araştırmaları. 8(1), 77-83.
- Gurbuz, F. (2015). The Views of pre-service teachers who take special teaching course within the context of pedagogical formation certificate program about micro-teaching method and a physics lesson plan. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 6(4), 1-17.
- Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Mason, L. H. (2003). Self-regulated strategy development in the classroom: part of a balanced approach to writing instruction for students with disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children. 35(7), 1-16.
- Hengirmen, M. (1998). Dilbilgisi ve dilbilimleri terimleri. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
- İlğan, A., Sevinç, Ö. S., & Arı, E. (2013). The Perceptions of teachers’ towards professional attitude contemporary teachers qualifications. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(2) 175-195
- Karakuş, İ. (2005). Türkçe, Türk dili ve edebiyatı öğretimi. Ankara: Can Yayınevi.
- Karataş, M. (2013). Turkish language classes at universities and attitude on Turkish language. Turkish Studies - International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 8(1), 1881-1898.
- Kavcar,C., Oğuzkan, F., & Aksoy, Ö. (2011). Yazılı ve sözlü anlatım. Ankara: Anı Yayınları.
- Kavcar,C., Sever, S., & Oğuzkan, F. (2001). Türkçe öğretimi. Ankara: Engin Yayınevi.
- Korkmaz, A. (1988). Türkçe kompozisyon. Ankara: Ecdad Yayınları.
- Köstekçi, M. (1992). An analysis study on sentence errors of university students (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
- MEB (2006). Türkçe 6, 7, 8. sınıflar Türkçe öğretim programı. Ankara: MEB Yay.
- MEB (2009). İlköğretim Türkçe dersi öğretim programı ve kılavuzu (1- 5. sınıflar). Ankara: MEB Yay.
- MEB (2011). Ortaöğretim Türk edebiyatı dersi 9, 10, 11 ve 12. sınıflar öğretim programı. Ankara: MEB Yay.
- Miles, B. M., & Huberman, A. M., (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book (2nd ed). California, USA: Sage Publications.
- Onaran, M. Ş. (1988). Yazım kılavuzlarının düşündürdükleri. Hürriyet Gösteri (91): 18-19.
- Öner, S. (1982). Örneklerle kompozisyon düzenli yazma ve konuşma sanatı. İstanbul: Kuşak Matbaası.
- Özdemir, O. (2011). Üniversitelerde Türkçe öğretimi sorunları. Gazi Üniversitesi Türkçe Araştırmaları Akademik Öğrenci Dergisi. 1(1).
- Paçacıoğlu, B. (2010). Türk Dili ve Kompozisyon. İstanbul: Hat Yayınevi.
- Sağır, M. (1995). Bazı yazım yanlışları ile anlatım bozukluklarının sorumluları. Türk Dili, 513, 238-245.
- Sağır, M. (1999). Dilbilim ve Türk dil bilgisi. Erzurum: Atatürk Üniversitesi Yayınları.
- Sever, S. (2004). Türkçe öğretimi ve tam öğrenme (4. bs.). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
- Tavşancıl, E. & Aslan, E. (2001). Sözel, yazılı ve diğer materyaller için içerik analizi ve uygulama örnekleri. İstanbul: Epsilon Yayınevi.
- TDK (2005). Türkçe sözlük. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
- Türnüklü, A. (2000). Eğitimbilim araştırmalarında etkin olarak kullanılabilecek nitel bir araştırma tekniği: Görüşme. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi. 24, 543
- Uludağ, E. (2002a). Students’ skill fullnes ın use of syntax and punctation ın middle school grades. Erzincan Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(1), 97-114.
- Uludağ, E. (2002b). The investigation of the ability level of the students’ use of syntax ın education faculty according to gender and program enrolled. Erzincan Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(2), 23-43.
- URL-1 (2017). http://tdk.gov.tr/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=187: Noktalama-Isaretleri-Aciklamalar&catid=50:yazm-kurallar&Itemid=132 erişim tarihi: 07.07.2017.
- URL-2 (2017). http://www.tomer.hacettepe.edu.tr/kitap2_211011.pdf erişim tarihi: 07.07.2017.
- Yakıcı, A., Yücel, M., Doğan M., & Yelok, V. S. (2004). Üniversiteler için Türkçe I yazılı anlatım. Ankara: Bilge Yayınları
- Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (9. bs.). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
