Author :
Abstract
Bu çalışmanın amacı öğretmen algılarına göre okul yöneticilerinin etik liderlik özellikleri ile yöneticilerin psikolojik sermaye düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkiyi belirlemektir. “Tarama” araştırma yöntemi kullanılarak yürütülen çalışmanın öğretmen örneklemini; İstanbul, Anadolu Yakası’nda çalışan 558 öğretmen oluşturmuştur. Araştırmanın okul yöneticisi örneklemini ise İstanbul Anadolu Yakası’nda katılımcı öğretmenlerle aynı eğitim örgütlerinde görev yapan 213 okul yöneticisi oluşturmuştur. Araştırmanın veri toplama araçları olarak; Palalar (2008) tarafından uyarlanmış olan ve üç alt boyuttan; etik ve adalet, görev ve rollerin açığa kavuşturulması ve güç paylaşımı oluşan “Etik Liderlik Ölçeği” ve Çetin ve Basım (2012) tarafından uyarlanmış olan; İyimserlik, umut, psikolojik dayanıklılık ve özyeterlilik alt boyutlarından oluşan “Psikolojik Sermaye” ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Etik liderlik ve psikolojik sermaye arasındaki ilişkisel boyutun belirlenmesi için tanımlayıcı istatistik yöntemleri ve Bağımsız Örneklemler T Testi, Tek Yönlü ANOVA, Pearson-Momentler Çarpımı Korelasyon Analizi ve Çoklu Doğrusal Regresyon Analizi kullanılmıştır. Veriler SPSS 23.00 paket programı ile analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma bulgularına göre, etik liderliğin görev ve rollerin açığa kavuşturulması alt boyutu ile, psikolojik sermayenin umut alt boyutu arasında ters yönlü zayıf bir korelasyon, psikolojik sermayenin alt boyutu olan özyeterlilik ile ters yönlü zayıf bir korelasyon, etik liderliğin güç paylaşımı boyutu ile psikolojik sermayenin özyeterlilik alt boyutu arasında ise ters yönlü zayıf bir korelasyon olduğu dikkat çekmektedir.
Keywords
Abstract
The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between school administrators’'ethical leadership characteristics and psychological capital levels according to teachers’ perceptions. This study, conducted using the "survey" research method has 558 teachers’ samples. The school administrators’ sample of the research was created by 213 school administrators working in the same educational organizations as the participant teachers on the Istanbul Anatolian side. As the data collection tools of the research; the "Ethical Leadership Scale", adapted by Palalar (2008) and consists of three sub-dimensions; ethical and justice, the opening of tasks and roles, and the sharing of power and The "Psychological Capital" scale adapted by Çetin ve Basım (2012); consisting of optimism, hope, psychological endurance and self-efficacy subscales was used. Descriptive statistical methods and independent samples T test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson-Moments Multiplication Correlation Analysis and Multiple Linear Regression Analysis were used to determine the relational dimension between ethical leadership and psychological capital. According to research findings, it’s noteworthy that there is a weak correlation between ethical leadership's subscale of opening of tasks and roles and psychological capital's hope subscale, a negative correlation with self-efficacy, which is the sub-dimension of psychological capital, there is there is a weak negative correlation between psychological capital’s self-efficacy and power sharing dimension of ethical leadership.
Keywords
- Akduru H., Semerciöz, F. (2016). The Relationship Between Ethical Leadership and Positive Psychological Capital in Firms: A research in Usak City, Eurasian Academy of Sciences Social Sciences Journal (1), 181-189.
- Avey, J. B., Luthans, F., Jensen, S. M. (2009). Psychological Capital: A Positive Resource For Combating Employee Stress and Turnover, Human Resource Management, 48 (5), 677
- Avey, J. B., Nimnicht, J. L., & Graber Pigeon, N. (2010). Two field studies examining the association between positive psychological capital and employee performance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 31(5), 384-401.
- Avey, J. B., Wernsing, T. S., & Palanski, M. E. (2012). Exploring the process of ethical leadership: The mediating role of employee voice and psychological ownership. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 21-34.
- Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
- Boniwell, I. (2008). Positive psychology in a nutshell: A balanced introduction to the science of optimal functioning. Personal Well-Being Centre.
- Bouckenooghe, D., Zafar, A., & Raja, U. (2015). How ethical leadership shapes employees’ job performance: The mediating roles of goal congruence and psychological capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(2), 251-264.
- Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 97(2), 117-134.
- Brown, M. E. (2007). Misconceptions of Ethical Leadership: How to Avoid Potential Pitfalls. Organizational Dynamics, 36(2), 140-155.
- Böke, K., Özdoğan, A., Sevinç, B., Güler, C., Büker, H., & Demir, İ. (2014). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri. İstanbul: Alfa yayıncılık.
- Burke, R. J., & Cooper, C. (Eds.). (2006). Inspiring leaders. Routledge.
- Bursalıoğlu, Z. (2005). Theory and Application in Teaching and Education. [Eğitim ve Öğretimde Teori ve uygulama] Ankara.
- Cemaloğlu, N., & Kılınç, A. Ç. (2012). İlköğretim Okulu Yöneticilerinin Etik Liderlik Davranışları ile Öğretmenlerin Algıladıkları Örgütsel Güven ve Yıldırma Arasındaki İlişki. Eğitim ve Bilim, 37(165).
- Connock, S., ve Johns, T. (1995). Ethical leadership. Institute of Personnel and Development.
- De Hoogh, A. H., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader's social responsibility, top management team effectiveness and subordinates' optimism: A multi-method study. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(3), 297-311.
- Freeman, R. E. ve Steward, L: (2006), “Developing Ethical Leadership”, Business Roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics, s. 2-15.
- Karasar, N. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
- Luthans, F. (2002a). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of organizational behavior, 23(6), 695-706.
- Luthans, F. (2002b). Positive organizational behavior: Developing and managing psychological strengths. Academy of Management Executive, 16(1): 57-72.
- Luthans, F. & Youssef, C. M. (2004). Human, Social and Now Positive Psychological Capital Management: Investing in People for Competitive Advantage. Organizational Dynamics. 33(2):143-160
- Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2007). Emerging positive organizational behavior. Journal of management, 33(3), 321-349.
- Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 541-572.
- Luthans, F., Norman, S. M., Avolio, B. J. & Avey, J. B. (2008). The Mediating Role of Psychological Capital in The Supportive Organizational Climate-Employee Performance Relationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior 29:219-238.
- Neider, L. L., & Schriesheim, C. A. (2014). Research in Management: Advences in Authentic and Ethical Leadership, 10. Baskı. Information Age Publishing.
- Peterson, Suzanne. J.; Fred, Luthans; Bruce J. Avolio; Fred, O. Walumbwa ve Zhen Zhangi. “Psychological Capital and Employee Performance: A Latent Growth Modeling Approach.” Personnel Psychology, 64, 2011, 427–450.
- Piccolo, R. F., Greenbaum, R., Hartog, D. N. D., & Folger, R. (2010). The relationship between ethical leadership and core job characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2‐ 3), 259-278.
- Pickett, M. C. (2005). Understanding ethical leadership. ASBBS E-Journal, 1(1), 44-54.
- Snyder, C. Rick (2000), Handbook of Hope, San Diego: AcademicPress.
- Toor, S. R., & Ofori, G. (2008). Role of psychological capital (PsyCap) in leadership effectiveness. In Proceedings of The CIB Joint W065/W055 International Symposium: Transformation through construction. Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
- Uğurlu, C. T., & Ceylan, N. (2014). Öğretmenlerin Örgütsel Yaratıcılık ve Etik Liderlik Algılarının İncelenmesi. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(2).
- Walumbwa, F. O., Mayer, D. M., Wang, P., Wang, H., Workman, K., & Christensen, A. L. (2011). Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The roles of leader–member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 204-213.
- Woolley, L. A. C., & Levy, L. (2011). Authentic leadership and followerdevelopment: Psychological capital, positive work climate, and gender. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 18(4), 438-448.
- Youssef, C. M., ve Luthans, F. (2007). Positive organizational behavior in the workplace: The impact of hope, optimism, and resilience. Journal of management, 33(5), 774-800.
- Zamahani, M., Ghorbani,V., Rezaei, F. (2011). Impact of Authentic Leadership and Psychological Capital on Followers Trust and Performance, Australion Journal of Basic and Applied sciences, 5(12), 658-667. EXTENDED ABSTRACT
