Author :
Abstract
Okullarda öğrenmenin etkili bir şekilde gerçekleşmesinde en önemli görev öğretmenlere düşmektedir. Etkili öğretmenler; öğretmenlik mesleğinin gerektirdiği profesyonelliğinin gereği, zaman içinde değişen, gelişen şartlara uygun olarak kendi mesleki gelişimlerine önem verirler. Ayrıca öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimleri, öğrencinin akademik başarısının geliştirilmesi ve etkili okul için de önemlidir. Öğretmenlerin öğretme işini daha etkili bir şekilde gerçekleştirmek için sahip oldukları mesleki bilgi, beceri, yeterlilikleri geliştirmeleri, yeni bir anlayış edinmeleri için gerçekleştirilen bütün faaliyetler mesleki gelişim kapsamında değerlendirilmektedir. Öğretmenlere daha nitelikli mesleki gelişim imkânlarının sunulmasında ve mesleki gelişim ihtiyaçlarının karşılanması konusunda okul yöneticilerine önemli sorumluluklar düşmektedir. Okul yöneticileri öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişim ihtiyaçlarını belirlemede, ihtiyaçlara uygun mesleki gelişim faaliyetleri düzenlemede, düzenlenen faaliyetlere katılımı teşvik etmede ve katılımı sağlamada, edinilen bilgilerin uygulamaya dökülmesinde kilit noktadaki bireylerdir. Ayrıca, bir mesleki gelişim eğitiminin niteliğini ve etkililiğini değerlendirmede, okul ortamını bütün paydaşlar için bir öğrenme ortamı olarak şekillendirmede ve öğrenmenin sonsuz bir bir süreç olduğu bilincini kazandırmada ve öğrenmeyi ihtiyaç haline getirmede önemli roller oynamaktadırlar. Bu çalışmanın mesleki gelişim faaliyetlerinin etkililiği için dikkat edilmesi gereken unsurlar ile mesleki gelişime rehberlik etmede okul yöneticilerine düşen görevler hakkında kaynak bilgi sağlama konusunda yararlı olacağı düşünülmektedir.
Keywords
Abstract
Teachers have the most important role to ensure the educational effectiveness of a school. Teachers as effective educators are aware of the importance of their professional development in accordance with the changing conditions over time. In addition, the professional development of teachers is important for both the student's academic achievement and effective schools. All activities carried out in order for teachers to develop their professional knowledge, skills, and competencies and to gain a new understanding in order to teach more effectively are evaluated within the scope of professional development. As for the professional development of teachers, school administrators have important responsibilities. School administrators need to provide teachers with more qualified professional development opportunities that meet their professional development needs, determine their professional development needs, organize professional development activities appropriate to their needs, encourage and ensure their participation in the organized activities, and encourage the implementation of the theoretical knowledge into practice. They also play an important role in assessing the quality and effectiveness of a professional development education, transforming the school environment into a learning environment for all faculty members, and raising awareness that learning is an endless process and making professional development a necessity. This study is thought to be useful in providing information about the factors to be considered for the effectiveness of professional development activities and the duties of school administrators in guiding professional development.
Keywords
- Ada, Ş., & Küçükali, R. (2006). Okul müdürlerinin eğitimsel liderlik davranışları (Erzurum ili örneği). Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi(13), 397-403.
- Ağaoğlu, E., Altınkurt, Y., Yılmaz, K., & Karaköse, T. (2012). Okul yöneticilerinin yeterliliklerine ilişkin okul yöneticilerinin ve öğretmenlerin görüşleri (Kütahya ili). Eğitim ve bilim, 37(164), 159-175.
- Aksoyalp, Y. (2010). 21. yüzyılda okul yöneticisinin niteliği: öğretim liderliği. The Journal of SAU Education Faculty(20), 140-150.
- Arizona Education Association. (2003). Professional development to improve teaching practice and student learning. Arizona Education Association. http://www.arizonaea.org/assets/document/quality_series1.pdf adresinden alındı
- Ball, D. L. (1996). Teacher learning and the mathematics reform: what we think we know and what we need to learn. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(7), 500-508.
- Bayrakçı, M. (2009). In-service teacher trainin in Japan and Turkey: a comparative analysis of institutions and practices. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1), 10-22.
- Behar-Horenstein, L. S. (1995). Promoting effective school leadership: a change-oriented model for the preparation of principals. Peabody Journal of Education, 70(3.), 18-40.
- Bellamy, G. T., Fulmer, C. L., Murphy, M. J., & Muth, R. (2007). Principal accomplishments: how school leaders succeed. New York: Teacher College PRess.
- Bhushan, R. (2013). Continious professional development through interaction and collaborative action research. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences(70), 131-136.
- Birman, B. F., Desimone, L., Porter, A. C., & Garet, M. S. (2000). Developing professioal development that works. Educational Leadership, 57(8), 28-33.
- Bolam, R., & McMahon, A. (2004). Literature, definitions and models: towards a conceptual map. C. Day, & J. Sachs (Dü) içinde, International Handbook on the Continuing Professional Development of Teachers (s. 33-65). Maidenhead: Open University Pres.
- Bredeson, P. V. (2001). Negotitated learning: unions contracts and teacher personal development. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 9(26), 1-24.
- Bredeson, P. V., & Johansson, O. (2000). The school principal's role in teacher professional development. Journal of In-Service Education, 26(2), 385-401.
- Browne-Ferrigno, T. (2003). Becoming a principal: role conception, initial socialization, role identity transformation, purposeful engagement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(4), 468-503.
- Bümen, N. T., Ateş, A., Çakar, E., Ural, G., & Acar, V. (2012). Türkiye bağlamında öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimi: sorunlar ve öneriler. Milli Eğitim(194), 31-50.
- Churukian, A. G. (1992). Avrupa Konseyi Ülkeleri Öğretmen Yetiştirme Politika ve Modelleri . Avrupa Konseyi Ülkeleri’nde Öğretmen Eğitimi Politika Modelleri: Sonuç Raporu ve Tavsiyeler (s. 243-246). İzmir: MEB, Ankara.
- Clement, M., & Vandenberghe, R. (2001). How school leaders can promote teachers' professional development: an account from the field. School Leadership and Management, 21(1), 43-57.
- Cohen, D., & Hill, H. (2000). Instructional policy and classroom performance: the mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record, 102(2), 294-343.
- Çelikten, M., Şanal, M., & Yeni, Ö. Y. (2005). Öğretmenlik mesleği ve özellikleri. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi(19), 207-237.
- Darling-Hammond, L. (1995). Changing concepts of teaching and teacher development. Teacher Education Quarterly, 22(4), 9-26.
- Day, C., & Sachs, J. (2004). International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers. Suffolk: Open University Press.
- DuFour, R., & Berkey, T. (1995). The principal as staff developer. Journal of Staff Development, 16(4), 2-6.
- Education and Training Policy. (2005). Teachers Matter: attracting, developing and retainin effective teachers. OECD. http://www.oecd.org/education/school/34990905.pdf adresinden alındı
- Erdem, A., & Koç, E. S. (2016). Classroom teachers' professional development activities within the scope of life long learning in Turkey. International Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 1503- 1513.
- Fullan, M. G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Golde , A. (1998). School-based continuous development: school leaders' responsibilites. Paper presented at the conference of the European Network for Improving Research and Development (Riga,Latvia, October 1-4, 1998). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED425515.pdf adresinden alındı
- Guskey, T. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
- Hart, A. W., & Bredeson, P. V. (1996). The principalship: a theory of professional learning and practice. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Hawley, W. D., & Valli, L. (1998). Guide to the national partnership for excellence and accountability in teaching (NPEAT). Washington DC.: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education. https://www.ericdigests.org/1999-3/npeat.htm adresinden alındı
- Holland, P. E. (2008-2009). The principal's role in teacher development. SRATE Journal, 17(1), 16-24.
- Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2013). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice. (9th b.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Ingvarson, L., Meiers, M., & Beavis, A. (2005). Factors affecting the impact of professional development programs on teacher's knowledge, practice, student outcomes & efficacy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(10), 1-28.
- Jez, R. J., & Luneta, K. (2018). Effective teacher trainin on inclusive practices: using needs and interests to design professional development and follow-up support in South Africa. Asian Journal of Inclusive Education, 6(1), 21-47.
- Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1988). Student achievement through staff development. New York: Longman.
- Kabakçı, I., Odabaşı, H. F., & Kılıçer, K. (2010). Transformative learning based mentoring for professional development of teacher educators in ICT: an approach for an emerging country. Journal of In-service Education, 36(12), 263-273.
- Kennedy, M. (1998). Form and substance in in-service teacher education (Research Monograph No.13). Arlington: VA: National Science Foundation.
- Krajeweski, R. (1996). Enculturating the school: the principal's principles. NASSP Bulletin(80), 3-8.
- Law, S. (1999). Leadership for learning: the changing culture of professional development in schools. Journal of Educational Administration(37), 66-79.
- Leithwood, K., & Mascall, B. (2008). Cellective leadership effects on student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 529-561.
- Liberman, A. (1996). Practices that support teacher development: transforming conceptions of professional learning. A. Lieberman, M. W. McLaughlin, & I. Oberman (Dü) içinde, Teacher learning: New policies, new practices (s. 185-201). New York: Teachers College PRess.
- Lieberman, A., & Miller, J. (1990). Teacher development in professional practice schools. Teachers College Record, 92(1), 105-122.
- Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers' professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129-151.
- Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., Love, N., & Hewson, P. W. (2010). Professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (3. b.). Thousand Oaks, Californica: Corwin.
- Lunenburg, F. C. (2010). Communication: the process, barriers and improving effectiveness. Schooling, 1(1), 1-11.
- Muijs, D., & Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership: improvement through empowerment? Educational Management and Administration, 31(4), 437-448.
- National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1996). What matters most: teaching for America's future. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
- O'Brien, J., & MacBeath, J. (1999). Co-ordinating staff development: the training and development of staff development co-ordinators. Journal of In-service Education(23),
- OECD. (1998). Education at a glance . OECD.
- Postholm, M. B. (2012). Teachers' professional development: a theoretical review. Educational Research, 54(4), 405-429.
- Rhodes, C., Stokes, M., & Hampton, G. (2004). A practical guide to mentoring, coaching and peer-networking: teacher professional development in schools and colleges. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
- Seferoğlu, S. S. (2001). Elementary school teachers' perceptions of professional development. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi(20), 117-125.
- Swafford, J. (1998). Teachers supporting teachers through peer coaching. Support for LEarning, 13(2), 54-58.
- Teaching and Learning International Survey. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning enviroments: first results from TALIS. OECD. http://www.oecd.org/education/school/43023606.pdf adresinden alındı
